JURISPRUDENCE
OHCHR.org

Search results  

25 results found page 1 of 3
Display name Treaties Countries Symbols Date of adoption of the Views Issues Articles Communications Type Of Decisions
S. C. and G. P. CESCR
  • Italy
  • E/C.12/65/D/22/2017
    07 Mar 2019
  • admissibility - exhaustion of domestic remedies
  • admissibility - ratione temporis
  • admissibility - victim status
  • health rights
  • CESCR-10
  • CESCR-12
  • CESCR-15-1-b
  • CESCR-15-3
  • CESCR-15-4
  • CESCR-3
  • 022/2017
Adoption of views
A. L. CESCR
  • Spain
  • E/C.12/65/D/41/2018
    01 Mar 2019
      • 041/2018
      Discontinuance decision
      M. V. CESCR
      • Spain
      • E/C.12/65/D/47/2018
        01 Mar 2019
          • 047/2018
          Discontinuance decision
          E. V. CESCR
          • Spain
          • E/C.12/65/D/42/2018
            01 Mar 2019
              • 042/2018
              Discontinuance decision
              Makinen Pankka and Fernández Pérez CESCR
              • Spain
              • E/C.12/65/D/9/2015
                01 Mar 2019
                • CESCR-11-1
                • CESCR-OP-2
                • CESCR-OP-3-1
                • CESCR-OP-3-2-a
                • CESCR-OP-3-2-b
                • CESCR-OP-3-2-e
                • 009/2015
                Inadmissibility decision
                Martínez Fernández CESCR
                • Spain
                • E/C.12/64/D/19/2016
                  08 Oct 2018
                • admissibility - exhaustion of domestic remedies
                • admissibility - manifestly ill-founded
                • admissibility - victim status
                • housing rights
                • CESCR-11-1
                • CESCR-OP-2
                • CESCR-OP-3-1
                • CESCR-OP-3-2-a
                • CESCR-OP-3-2-b
                • CESCR-OP-3-2-e
                • 019/2016
                Inadmissibility decision
                Arellano Medina CESCR
                • Ecuador
                • E/C.12/63/D/7/2015
                  26 Mar 2018
                • admissibility - exhaustion of domestic remedies
                • admissibility - manifestly ill-founded
                • admissibility - ratione temporis
                • work-employment rights
                • CESCR-12
                • CESCR-2
                • CESCR-6
                • CESCR-7
                • CESCR-OP-3-1
                • CESCR-OP-3-2-e
                • 007/2015
                Inadmissibility decision
                Trujillo Calero CESCR
                • Ecuador
                • E/C.12/63/D/10/2015
                  26 Mar 2018
                • admissibility - manifestly ill-founded
                • admissibility - ratione materiae
                • admissibility - ratione temporis
                • discrimination against women
                • equality between men and women
                • social security rights
                • CESCR-2-2
                • CESCR-3
                • CESCR-9
                • CESCR-OP-3-2-b
                • CESCR-OP-3-2-d
                • CESCR-OP-3-2-e
                • 010/2015
                Adoption of views
                Alarcón Flores et al CESCR
                • Ecuador
                • E/C.12/62/D/14/2016
                  04 Oct 2017
                • admissibility - exhaustion of domestic remedies
                • admissibility - manifestly ill-founded
                • admissibility - ratione temporis
                • social security rights
                  • 014/2016
                  Inadmissibility decision
                  Martins Coelho CESCR
                  • Portugal
                  • E/C.12/61/D/21/2017
                    06 Jul 2017
                  • admissibility - manifestly ill-founded
                  • admissibility - ratione temporis
                  • work-employment rights
                  • CESCR-7
                  • CESCR-7-c
                  • CESCR-OP-3-2-b
                  • CESCR-OP-3-2-e
                  • 021/2017
                  Inadmissibility decision

                  *This database is based on a database designed and developed by the Netherlands Institute of Human Rights (SIM) of Utrecht University which has agreed to make its database available to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.