T. M. and Z. I v. Uzbekistan

Comment:

Under rule 92 of its Rules of Procedure, the Committee, acting through its Special Rapporteur for New Communications and Interim Measures, requested the State party, on 13 October 2003, not to carry out the executions of the authors' sons, so as to enable the Committee to examine their complaint.

Substantive issues:

• accused persons / convicted persons
• arbitrary detention - arrest
• criminal charges
• criminal offence
• cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment
• fair trial
• human dignity
• liberty of person
• presumption of innocence
• recognition as a person before the law
• right to life
• torture

Substantive articles:

• 6 (1)
• 7
• 9 (1)
• 10 (1)
• 14 (1)
• 14 (2)
• 14 (3)
• 16

Procedural issues:

• interim measures

Procedural articles:

• 2