JURISPRUDENCE
OHCHR.org

Committee
CCPR
Communication number(s)
550/1993,
Author
Robert Faurisson
Display name
Faurisson
Victim
Robert Faurisson
Countries
  • France
  • Date of admissibility
    19 Jul 1995
    Submission date
    02 Jan 1993
    Date of adoption of the Views
    08 Nov 1996
    Session No
    58
    Type of decision
    Adoption of views
    Comment
    Pursuant to rule 85 of the Committee's rules of procedure, Committee members Christine Chanet and Thomas Buergenthal did not participate in the consideration of the case. A statement made by Mr. Buergental was appended to the views. (Appendix A) Five individual opinions were submitted, signed by seven members: B. Nisuke Ando (concurring) C. Elizabeth Evatt and David Kretzmer, co-signed by Eckart Klein (concurring) D. Cecilia Medina Quiroga (concurring) E. Rajsoomer Lallah (concurring) F. Prafullachandra Bhagwati (concurring)
    Issues
  • access to court
  • accused persons / convicted persons
  • admissibility - exhaustion of domestic remedies
  • competent, independent and impartial tribunal
  • effective remedy
  • fair trial
  • freedom of expression
  • freedom of thought, conscience or religion
  • incitement to racial discrimination, violence or hatred
  • limitations of rights
  • ne bis in idem
  • restrictions of rights
  • Articles
  • CCPR-14-1
  • CCPR-14-7
  • CCPR-19-1
  • CCPR-19-2
  • CCPR-19-3
  • CCPR-20-2
  • CCPR-OP-2
  • CCPR-OP-5-2-b


  • CCPR/C/58/D/550/1993


    Language   Doc   Docx   Pdf   html  
    English .pdf
    Français .pdf
    Español .pdf

    *This database is based on a database designed and developed by the Netherlands Institute of Human Rights (SIM) of Utrecht University which has agreed to make its database available to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.