JURISPRUDENCE
OHCHR.org

Search results  

2538 results found page 1 of 254
Display name Treaties Countries Symbols Date of adoption of the Views Issues Articles Communications Type Of Decisions
D.D. CRC
  • Spain
  • CRC/C/80/R/4/2016
    31 Jan 2019
  • best interests of the child
  • cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment
  • non-refoulement
  • CRC-20
  • CRC-3
  • CRC-37
  • 004/2016
Adoption of views
M.G. CAT
  • Switzerland
  • CAT/C/65/D/811/2017
    07 Dec 2018
  • admissibility - exhaustion of domestic remedies
  • cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment
  • non-refoulement
  • torture prevention
  • CAT-16
  • CAT-3
  • 811/2017
Adoption of views
Adam Harun CAT
  • Switzerland
  • CAT/C/65/D/758/2016
    06 Dec 2018
  • admissibility - ratione materiae
  • cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment
  • non-refoulement
  • reparation
  • torture prevention
  • CAT-14
  • CAT-16
  • CAT-3
  • 758/2016
Adoption of views
S. CAT
  • Sweden
  • CAT/C/65/D/691/2015
    16 Nov 2018
  • admissibility - manifestly ill-founded
  • non-refoulement
  • torture prevention
  • CAT-22
  • CAT-3
  • 691/2015
Adoption of views
B.M. CAT
  • Switzerland
  • CAT/C/65/D/584/2014
    15 Nov 2018
  • non-refoulement
  • CAT-3
  • 584/2014
Discontinuance decision
A.S. CAT
  • Canada
  • CAT/C/65/D/679/2015
    15 Nov 2018
  • non-refoulement
  • CAT-3
  • 679/2015
Discontinuance decision
K.B. CAT
  • Canada
  • CAT/C/65/D/739/2016
    15 Nov 2018
  • non-refoulement
  • CAT-3
  • 739/2016
Discontinuance decision
A.M. CAT
  • Sweden
  • CAT/C/65/D/859/2018
    15 Nov 2018
  • non-refoulement
  • CAT-3
  • 859/2018
Discontinuance decision
M.A. CAT
  • Sweden
  • CAT/C/65/D/796/2017
    15 Nov 2018
  • non-refoulement
  • CAT-3
  • 796/2017
Discontinuance decision
F.K.A. CAT
  • Canada
  • CAT/C/65/D/784/2016
    15 Nov 2018
  • admissibility - exhaustion of domestic remedies
  • admissibility - incompatibility
  • non-refoulement
  • torture prevention
  • CAT-22
  • CAT-3
  • 784/2016
Inadmissibility decision

*This database is based on a database designed and developed by the Netherlands Institute of Human Rights (SIM) of Utrecht University which has agreed to make its database available to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.