Ng v. Canada

Comment:

8 individual opinions have been submitted, signed by 9 members: A. Mr. Fausto Pocar (partly dissenting, partly concurring and elaborating) B. Messrs. A. Mavrommatis and W. Sadi (dissenting) C. Mr. Rajsoomer Lallah (dissenting) D. Mr. Bertil Wennergren (partly dissenting, partly concurring) E. Mr. Kurt Herndl (dissenting) F. Mr. Nisuke Ando (dissenting) G. Mr. Francisco Jose Aguilar Urbina (dissenting) H. Ms. Christine Chanet (dissenting) A decision under rule 86 of the Committee's rules of procedure was adopted. The text of this decision is not included in the text of the final views. On 28 October 1992, the Committee decided to join the consideration of admissibility and merits.

Substantive issues:

• cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment
• death penalty
• extradition
• right to life

Substantive articles:

• 2 (1)
• 6 (1)
• 6 (2)
• 7

Procedural issues:

• exhaustion of domestic remedies
• victim status
• interim measures
• jurisdiction

Procedural articles:

• 1
• 5 (2) (b)